Difference between revisions of "Wiki reorganization"

From AMule Project FAQ
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 16: Line 16:
 
* [[Getting_Started]] - Update screenshots, rework outdated passages, add information about fake server
 
* [[Getting_Started]] - Update screenshots, rework outdated passages, add information about fake server
 
* [[Ed2k_links_handling]] - Remove discontinued browser, update screenshots, check information for correctness
 
* [[Ed2k_links_handling]] - Remove discontinued browser, update screenshots, check information for correctness
 +
* [[Usage_Preferences]] - update preferences description to current version
 
* [[aMule CVS]] - [[Special:Whatlinkshere/AMule_CVS|Pages still linking to it]] probably need a touch-up anyway and references should be changed to [[aMule SVN]].
 
* [[aMule CVS]] - [[Special:Whatlinkshere/AMule_CVS|Pages still linking to it]] probably need a touch-up anyway and references should be changed to [[aMule SVN]].
  

Revision as of 14:16, 6 June 2008

Wiki reorganization

Why?

Unfortunately many pages in our wiki are outdated - they contain old information, tutorials don't work anymore in aMule 2.2.1 or recent SVN snapshots and some information are even incorrect now. In order to improve the quality of our documentation old pages should be reworked and outdated information replaced by current and correct texts. aMule 2.1.3 is outdated, references to it (or even older versions) should be replaced by references to aMule SVN.

How can I help?

The easiest way is to read the wiki and add any outdated pages you find to the list below. Add a short note on what needs an update, please. If you feel comfortable doing more, have a look at the list of pages below and see which ones you could rework. Once the complaint is resolved, you can add a remark that you updated the page.

Pages in need of an update

List of outdated pages

outdated / incorrect translations

Style change

No Version sections

If you encounter any Version sections (created by, updated by), please delete them. These information are available to everyone using the history function. This doesn't mean that the work of all contributors is less recognized, but the layout is cleaner this way.