Difference between revisions of "User:Unleashed"
From AMule Project FAQ
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | [ | + | [[aMule]] err... something :) |
− | This guy appears from nowhere from time to time to commit some minor bugfix or security related patch. All *mule codebases drive pain into his eyes, so in order to keep himself sane | + | This guy appears from nowhere from time to time to commit some minor bugfix or security related patch. All *[[mule]] codebases drive pain into his eyes, so in order to keep himself sane he prefers looking at a very low rate of lines of code per month. ;) |
− | Current programming interests are mainly focused in secure programming and high performance networking in Linux and *BSD (would love to see someday an | + | Current programming interests are mainly focused in secure programming and [http://www.kegel.com/c10k.html high performance networking] in [http://www.kernel.org Linux] and *[http://www.bsd.org BSD] (would love to see someday an [[FAQ_eD2k-Kademlia#What_is_ED2K?|ed2k]] core-only client/server using something like [http://www.xmailserver.org/linux-patches/nio-improve.html epoll]/[http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=kqueue&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=FreeBSD+5.0-current&format=html kqueues]). |
Latest revision as of 18:59, 17 September 2004
aMule err... something :)
This guy appears from nowhere from time to time to commit some minor bugfix or security related patch. All *mule codebases drive pain into his eyes, so in order to keep himself sane he prefers looking at a very low rate of lines of code per month. ;)
Current programming interests are mainly focused in secure programming and high performance networking in Linux and *BSD (would love to see someday an ed2k core-only client/server using something like epoll/kqueues).