Difference between revisions of "Talk:CryptoppDebian"
From AMule Project FAQ
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I don't see the point on compiling Crypto++ through Debian sources. It would be better to have directly the binnaries installed IMHO. If there's some point in compiling sources first I'd appreciate the comment. Otherwise, I'll edit the page with the epropiate lines to install directly the binnaries and fix them with the sym-link. | I don't see the point on compiling Crypto++ through Debian sources. It would be better to have directly the binnaries installed IMHO. If there's some point in compiling sources first I'd appreciate the comment. Otherwise, I'll edit the page with the epropiate lines to install directly the binnaries and fix them with the sym-link. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Is there any point to this at all anymore, now that amule has crypto embedded? Even when I install the crypto libs on Debian amule doesn't use them. Is there any advantage to compiling with --disable-embedded-crypto? | ||
Revision as of 06:03, 2 August 2005
I don't see the point on compiling Crypto++ through Debian sources. It would be better to have directly the binnaries installed IMHO. If there's some point in compiling sources first I'd appreciate the comment. Otherwise, I'll edit the page with the epropiate lines to install directly the binnaries and fix them with the sym-link.
Is there any point to this at all anymore, now that amule has crypto embedded? Even when I install the crypto libs on Debian amule doesn't use them. Is there any advantage to compiling with --disable-embedded-crypto?
